# Audit: display
audit-version: 1
audited-at: 2026-06-26
scope: eidos  (eidos-only primitive)
method: theming-coherence category sweep (typography), adversarially verified; roles + `:Morfo` lead-verified CLEAN across all eidos (no success/warning/danger/info; only alert-dialog uses `:Morfo`).

## Summary
Counts (post-verification): CRITICAL 0 · HIGH 0 · MEDIUM 0 · LOW 1.
conformance: morfo OK; no recipe; roles fragmented (content-role subset)
as-const: true · roles clean: false · variants clean: true · has-recipe: false

## Findings
### LOW: em-literal for underline offset; hero sizing is special case — display-002   <!-- id: display-002 -->
- dimension: E-bis: Theming (SIZES)
- location: src/uix/eidos/components/display/display.css:33
- evidence: text-underline-offset: 0.12em (different from text 0.15em)
- impact: Magic em literal; intentional hero differentiation but undocumented as canonical
- proposed-fix: Define --display-underline-offset or document hero-specific em scale
- verify: [downgraded] display.css:33 'text-underline-offset: 0.12em' is an em-relative underline offset for hero copy. The 0.12 vs 0.15 difference is a deliberate optical choice at hero sizes (smaller offset reads better on large type), documented in types.ts:20-27 re: hero tracking. No canonical --*-underline-offset token exists; em is the accepted unit (cf. link recipe base.ts:878). Cosmetic em literal, not drift aga
- fix-status: open

## Theming facts (E-bis)
- magic literals: 0.12em @ src/uix/eidos/components/display/display.css:33 -> canonical display-underline-offset token (or hero scale)
- magic z-index: none
- non-canonical names: none
- roles clean: false · variants clean: true