Style fix — input chrome was hand-rolled with raw color tokens
(`--color-neutral-border`, `--ring-width`) instead of consuming the
recipe layer like every other text input. Now matches search-field and
number-field exactly:
- Added `password-field` recipe to `src/uix/eidos/lib/recipes/base.ts`
with the same surface as `search-field` (height, px, gap, font-size
per size; border, focus, invalid, bg, color, focus-shadow tokens).
- Regenerated `src/uix/eidos/generated/base.css`.
- Rewrote `password-field.css` to consume the new tokens — same focus
ring (`focus-shadow`), same border colors, same disabled opacity,
same transition tokens. VisibilityTrigger gets its own border/bg/
color-on-hover scheme aligned with search-field's clear button.
- Added per-size icon + caps font-size tokens so the trigger and caps
pill scale with the input.
Form + SIUM demo — answers "how does PasswordField validate?":
Added a new subsection in the Live tab with three working forms wired
through `<Form>` + `<Field>` and SIUM schemas:
1. Login (purpose='current', non-empty password)
2. Registration (purpose='new', complexity rules via regex pipes —
uppercase + digit + symbol + 8+ chars, plus the visual StrengthMeter
as a companion to the schema)
3. Password change (3 fields with a cross-field `refine()` so new ===
confirm; demonstrates SIUM's refine pattern)
The section explicitly documents that PasswordField has no built-in
complexity rules — validation is schema-first. The schema decides
what's "correct"; PasswordField's flags propagate via Field's OR-merge
of `formFieldState.isInvalid`.
svelte-check: 0 errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
