User decided (mirroring F7's corpus-shape call): arts stay
E5-in-place-reconciled with only active-app promoted to an architecture
chapter; orca stays E5 for now; the DESIGN docs move to docs/decisions/
translated. B1/B2 locked; A1/A2 (drift + language) unaffected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The docs reconciliation (F6 drift-fix + F7 corpus-libro) covered
active-uix (morfo/soma/sema/eidos) but left the active-app side — the 22
arts/ runtime artifacts — as E5-in-place, un-reconciled. This plan does
for arts what F6+F7 did for the UIX layers, grounded in a 22-agent
per-art audit (every drift verified against the code): ~40 doc-vs-code
mismatches across 15 arts, 12 READMEs needing ES->EN, ethereal missing a
README, 3 historical DESIGN docs, dead route/demo cross-refs. Batches
A0 (guard) / A1 (drift sweep) / A2 (ES->EN) / A3 (ethereal README) / B1
(active-app -> architecture chapter, the missing analogue of
active-uix) / B2 (DESIGN docs -> decisions/) / B3 (index+TOC). Three
structural open questions for the user (arts E5 vs book; orca chapter;
DESIGN docs move) mirror F7's corpus-shape decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
dev