method: adversarially-verified workflow (analyze → refute); HIGH/CRITICAL personally re-verified by the lead. Batch-3 ground-truth: each picker fires trigger(close) (close NOT inert), but open/commit-reset ARE inert; calendar/range-calendar are MID-REFACTOR (uncommitted view-switch work).
- verify: [confirmed] CONFIRMED — SYS-1 scope-drift. morfo line 13: `scope: ['soma', 'sema'],` omits 'eidos', yet a full eidos recipe dir exists at src/uix/eidos/components/time-range-picker/ (14 files: time-range-picker.css 392 lines, .svelte parts, index.ts, types.ts, README.md). This is the known systemic SYS-1 pattern (MEDIUM). The eidos layer genuinely materializes this component (CSS targets [data-time-range-picker]*) so the scope array is incomplete. Confidence high, severity MEDIUM as baselined.
- impact: Hardcoded values prevent consistent scaling via design tokens. Updates to spacing/sizing token system won't cascade to these edge cases.
- proposed-fix: Extract to --space-* and --radius-* tokens or --_time-range-picker-* local vars. E.g., `gap: var(--space-px)` or `gap: var(--_scale-tick-gap, 2px)` as fallback.
- verify: [downgraded] DOWNGRADED MEDIUM→LOW. Re-read the cited lines: 235 `gap: 2px` (.time-range-picker-slider), 241 `block-size: 0.875rem` (.time-range-picker-scale), 254 `gap: 1px` (.time-range-picker-scale-tick), 265 `inline-size: 1px` + 266 `block-size: 4px` (.time-range-picker-scale-mark — a hairline ruler tick mark), 329 `padding: 2px` (.day-period-toggle inner padding), 339 `min-inline-size: 2.25rem` (.day-period-item min width). These are decorative RULER geometry on plain `.time-range-picker-*` HELPER classes (not morfo data-attr selectors) — sub-pixel tick/mark dimensions that are intrinsic hairline geometry, not layout on the design-token rhythm. The 2px toggle padding and 2.25rem item width are borderline tokenizable but cosmetic and decorative-scaffold scoped. Note 0.875rem == --font-size-xs value but used as a block-size for a ruler band, not a font. MEDIUM overstates user/contract impact; this is LOW token-hygiene on ornamental ruler chrome.
- evidence: Line 197 `@media (max-width: 40rem)` + lines 102/152 `flex: 1 1 7rem` (field width). Line 241 `block-size: 0.875rem` (scale height). No token references.
- impact: Responsive breakpoint and sizing coupled to hardcoded values. Violates token-driven design consistency.
- proposed-fix: Use responsive size tokens or --space-* family. E.g., `--_endpoint-input-basis: var(--space-28, 7rem)`. Align breakpoints to canonical design system.
- verify: [downgraded] DOWNGRADED MEDIUM→LOW. Line 197 `@media (max-width: 40rem)` is a local responsive breakpoint collapsing the 2-col clock grid to 1-col; lines 102 `flex: 1 1 7rem` ([data-time-range-field-input]) and 152 `flex: 1 1 7rem`... (actually 102 is `flex: 1 1 7rem`, 152 is `inline-size: calc(var(--_time-field-height) - var(--space-2))` which IS token-based). The real literal is the 7rem flex-basis (endpoint input min width) and the 40rem media query. These are component-local layout tuning, not on the spacing/size token scale, and there is no canonical responsive-token primitive for arbitrary flex-basis. Same family as 002 — LOW token-hygiene, not MEDIUM. The 152 part of the cited evidence is actually correct token usage (`var(--_time-field-height) - var(--space-2)`), so the evidence is partly inaccurate.